Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
less than
1 minute
Read so far

Mobile Phones and Development

0 comments
Affiliation
The Economist
Summary

This article argues that the mobile phone, rather than the personal computer, offers the greatest potential for bridging the digital divide. Mobile phones, according to the author, offer a useful communication opportunity in places where other forms of communication are limited. Furthermore, the article cites research indicating a .6% increase in GDP growth for every increase of 10 mobile phones per 100 people.

Despite the benefits, the article notes that handset costs have kept individual ownership levels around 5% in both India and sub-Saharan Africa. In response, the GSM Association (GSMA) and operators from a number of developing countries accepted bids on a contract to produce 6 million relatively inexpensive handsets. The contract was won by Motorola and the less expensive (US$40 compared to US$200) handsets are expected to be delivered in January 2006.

Another barrier cited as limiting growth in this area is the high taxation and duties on both handsets and services. The article describes production efforts in Brazil designed to avoid import duties by producing phones in-country. However, it is noted that smaller, poorer countries rely on black market acquisitions to avoid taxation and duty costs. The authors note that "there is anecdotal evidence that reducing taxes on handsets can boost government revenues. People would rather pay a small tax on a legal handset than no tax on a smuggled one that cannot be returned if it goes wrong." It is hoped that a GMSA study underway at the time of writing will support the argument for reducing taxes on mobile phones.

Source